We’re sorry, but GBIF doesn’t work properly without JavaScript enabled.
Our website has detected that you are using an outdated insecure browser that will prevent you from using the site. We suggest you upgrade to a modern browser.
{{nav.loginGreeting}}
  • Get data
      • Occurrences
      • GBIF API
      • Species
      • Datasets
      • Trends
  • How-to
    • Share data

      • Quick-start guide
      • Dataset classes
      • Data hosting
      • Standards
      • Become a publisher
      • Data quality
      • Data papers
    • Use data

      • Featured data use
      • Citation guidelines
      • GBIF citations
      • Citation widget
  • Tools
    • Publishing

      • IPT
      • Data validator
      • Scientific Collections
      • Suggest a dataset
    • Data access and use

      • Hosted portals
      • Data processing
      • Derived datasets
      • rgbif
      • pygbif
      • MAXENT
      • Tools catalogue
    • GBIF labs

      • Species matching
      • Name parser
      • Sequence ID
      • Relative observation trends
      • GBIF data blog
  • Community
    • Network

      • Participant network
      • Nodes
      • Publishers
      • Network contacts
      • Community forum
      • alliance for biodiversity knowledge
    • Volunteers

      • Mentors
      • Ambassadors
      • Translators
      • Citizen scientists
    • Activities

      • Capacity enhancement
      • Programmes & projects
      • Training and learning resources
      • Data Use Club
      • Living Atlases
  • About
    • Inside GBIF

      • What is GBIF?
      • Become a member
      • Governance
      • Funders
      • Partnerships
      • Release notes
      • Implementation plan
      • Contacts
    • News & outreach

      • News
      • Newsletters and lists
      • Events
      • Ebbe Nielsen Challenge
      • Young Researchers Award
      • Science Review
  • User profile

Standard filtration practices significantly distort planktonic microbial diversity estimates

Dataset homepage

Citation

MGnify (2019). Standard filtration practices significantly distort planktonic microbial diversity estimates. Sampling event dataset https://doi.org/10.15468/bx3xch accessed via GBIF.org on 2022-07-07.

Description

Filtration is the standard method for isolating planktonic microbial biomass for analysis. It is unclear how the taxonomic composition of biomass on a filter changes as a function of filtered water volume, potentially due to filter clogging. Using seawater from a marine oxygen minimum zone, we conducted experiments to quantify the 16S rRNA gene composition of biomass on a prefilter (GF/A, 1.6 um pore size) and a downstream collection filter (Sterivex, 0.2 um) over a range of typical collection volumes, from 50 to 5000 ml. Significant community shifts occurred in both filter fractions, and were most dramatic in the prefilter community. Sequences affiliated with Vibrionales decreased from ~40-60% of the prefilter datasets at low volumes (50-500 ml) to less than 5% at higher volumes, while groups such at the Chromatiales and Thiohalorhabdales followed opposite trends, increasing from minor representation to become the dominant taxa at higher volumes. Taxa shown previously to be associated with marine particles, including diverse members of the Deltaproteobacteria, Planctomycetes and Bacteroidetes, were among those showing the greatest increase with filter volume (4 to 27-fold). Metrics of taxon richness (97% sequence clusters) also varied significantly with volume, and in opposing directions depending on filter fraction, highlighting potential biases in community complexity estimates. These data raise serious concerns for studies using filter fractionation to separate biomass for quantitative comparisons of aquatic microbial diversity, for example between free-living and particle-associated communities.

Sampling Description

Sampling

Filtration is the standard method for isolating planktonic microbial biomass for analysis. It is unclear how the taxonomic composition of biomass on a filter changes as a function of filtered water volume, potentially due to filter clogging. Using seawater from a marine oxygen minimum zone, we conducted experiments to quantify the 16S rRNA gene composition of biomass on a prefilter (GF/A, 1.6 um pore size) and a downstream collection filter (Sterivex, 0.2 um) over a range of typical collection volumes, from 50 to 5000 ml. Significant community shifts occurred in both filter fractions, and were most dramatic in the prefilter community. Sequences affiliated with Vibrionales decreased from ~40-60% of the prefilter datasets at low volumes (50-500 ml) to less than 5% at higher volumes, while groups such at the Chromatiales and Thiohalorhabdales followed opposite trends, increasing from minor representation to become the dominant taxa at higher volumes. Taxa shown previously to be associated with marine particles, including diverse members of the Deltaproteobacteria, Planctomycetes and Bacteroidetes, were among those showing the greatest increase with filter volume (4 to 27-fold). Metrics of taxon richness (97% sequence clusters) also varied significantly with volume, and in opposing directions depending on filter fraction, highlighting potential biases in community complexity estimates. These data raise serious concerns for studies using filter fractionation to separate biomass for quantitative comparisons of aquatic microbial diversity, for example between free-living and particle-associated communities.

Method steps

  1. Pipeline used: https://www.ebi.ac.uk/metagenomics/pipelines/4.1

Taxonomic Coverages

Geographic Coverages

Bibliographic Citations

  1. Padilla CC, Ganesh S, Gantt S, Huhman A, Parris DJ, Sarode N, Stewart FJ. 2015. Standard filtration practices may significantly distort planktonic microbial diversity estimates. Front Microbiol vol. 6 - DOI:10.3389/fmicb.2015.00547

Contacts

originator
Georgia Institute of Technology
metadata author
Georgia Institute of Technology
administrative point of contact
Georgia Institute of Technology
What is GBIF? API FAQ Newsletter Privacy Terms and agreements Citation Code of Conduct Acknowledgements
Contact GBIF Secretariat Universitetsparken 15 DK-2100 Copenhagen Ø Denmark