We’re sorry, but GBIF doesn’t work properly without JavaScript enabled.
Our website has detected that you are using an outdated insecure browser that will prevent you from using the site. We suggest you upgrade to a modern browser.
{{nav.loginGreeting}}
  • Get data
      • Occurrences
      • GBIF API
      • Species
      • Datasets
      • Occurrence snapshots
      • Hosted portals
      • Trends
  • How-to
    • Share data

      • Quick-start guide
      • Dataset classes
      • Data hosting
      • Standards
      • Become a publisher
      • Data quality
      • Data papers
    • Use data

      • Featured data use
      • Citation guidelines
      • GBIF citations
      • Citation widget
  • Tools
    • Publishing

      • IPT
      • Data validator
      • Scientific Collections
      • Suggest a dataset
      • New data model ⭐️
    • Data access and use

      • Hosted portals
      • Data processing
      • Derived datasets
      • rgbif
      • pygbif
      • MAXENT
      • Tools catalogue
    • GBIF labs

      • Species matching
      • Name parser
      • Sequence ID
      • Relative observation trends
      • GBIF data blog
  • Community
    • Network

      • Participant network
      • Nodes
      • Publishers
      • Network contacts
      • Community forum
      • alliance for biodiversity knowledge
    • Volunteers

      • Mentors
      • Ambassadors
      • Translators
      • Citizen scientists
    • Activities

      • Capacity enhancement
      • Programmes & projects
      • Training and learning resources
      • Data Use Club
      • Living Atlases
  • About
    • Inside GBIF

      • What is GBIF?
      • Become a member
      • Governance
      • Implementation plan
      • Work Programme
      • Funders
      • Partnerships
      • Release notes
      • Contacts
    • News & outreach

      • News
      • Newsletters and lists
      • Events
      • Awards
      • Science Review
      • Data use
  • User profile

It was verified the impact of irrigation treatments (wet, optimal, dry and very dry) and three potato cultivars on soil microbial community.

Citation

MGnify (2018). It was verified the impact of irrigation treatments (wet, optimal, dry and very dry) and three potato cultivars on soil microbial community.. Sampling event dataset https://doi.org/10.15468/vsogsu accessed via GBIF.org on 2023-10-01.

Description

The water management was classified into four soil water matric potential mean: -15 kPa (Wet), -25 kPa (Optimal), -30 kPa (Dry) and -45 kPa (Very Dry). The three potato cultivars used were Goldrush (most cultivated mid-season variety in Quebec), Envol (popular early variety), and Red Maria (mid-late to late variety).

Sampling Description

Sampling

The water management was classified into four soil water matric potential mean: -15 kPa (Wet), -25 kPa (Optimal), -30 kPa (Dry) and -45 kPa (Very Dry). The three potato cultivars used were Goldrush (most cultivated mid-season variety in Quebec), Envol (popular early variety), and Red Maria (mid-late to late variety).

Method steps

  1. Pipeline used: https://www.ebi.ac.uk/metagenomics/pipelines/4.1

Taxonomic Coverages

Geographic Coverages

Bibliographic Citations

Contacts

originator
INRS-ETE
metadata author
INRS-ETE
administrative point of contact
INRS-ETE
What is GBIF? API FAQ Newsletter Privacy Terms and agreements Citation Code of Conduct Acknowledgements
Contact GBIF Secretariat Universitetsparken 15 DK-2100 Copenhagen Ø Denmark
GBIF is a Global Core Biodata Resource