We’re sorry, but GBIF doesn’t work properly without JavaScript enabled.
Our website has detected that you are using an outdated insecure browser that will prevent you from using the site. We suggest you upgrade to a modern browser.
{{nav.loginGreeting}}
  • Get data
      • Occurrences
      • GBIF API
      • Species
      • Datasets
      • Occurrence snapshots
      • Hosted portals
      • Trends
  • How-to
    • Share data

      • Quick-start guide
      • Dataset classes
      • Data hosting
      • Standards
      • Become a publisher
      • Data quality
      • Data papers
    • Use data

      • Featured data use
      • Citation guidelines
      • GBIF citations
      • Citation widget
  • Tools
    • Publishing

      • IPT
      • Data validator
      • Scientific Collections
      • Suggest a dataset
      • New data model ⭐️
    • Data access and use

      • Hosted portals
      • Data processing
      • Derived datasets
      • rgbif
      • pygbif
      • MAXENT
      • Tools catalogue
    • GBIF labs

      • Species matching
      • Name parser
      • Sequence ID
      • Relative observation trends
      • GBIF data blog
  • Community
    • Network

      • Participant network
      • Nodes
      • Publishers
      • Network contacts
      • Community forum
      • alliance for biodiversity knowledge
    • Volunteers

      • Mentors
      • Ambassadors
      • Translators
      • Citizen scientists
    • Activities

      • Capacity enhancement
      • Programmes & projects
      • Training and learning resources
      • Data Use Club
      • Living Atlases
  • About
    • Inside GBIF

      • What is GBIF?
      • Become a member
      • Governance
      • Implementation plan
      • Work Programme
      • Funders
      • Partnerships
      • Release notes
      • Contacts
    • News & outreach

      • News
      • Newsletters and lists
      • Events
      • Ebbe Nielsen Challenge
      • Graduate Researchers Award
      • Science Review
      • Data use
  • User profile

The Fungarium of Yugra State University

Dataset homepage

Citation

Filippova N (2023). The Fungarium of Yugra State University. Version 1.115. Yugra State University Biological Collection (YSU BC). Occurrence dataset https://doi.org/10.15468/g4bk6h accessed via GBIF.org on 2023-03-28.

Description

The Fungarium of Yugra State University is a systematic reference collection of fungi organized as a part of the Yugra State University Biological Collection (YSU BC). The main purpose of the Fungarium is to initiate and facilitate systematic studies of fungi in the region. It also serves for education and can be used by specialists in different applied disciplines.

The taxonomical structure of the collections currently includes the total number of species represented – 1205, genera represented – 460, families represented – 154. The majority of the specimens in the YSU Fungarium belong to the Basidiomycota (about 86%), less to Ascomycota (12%) with few specimens of Zygomycota and Myxomycota. The majority of specimens were collected in Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Okrug (95%), with 11 other regions of Russia represented by small numbers.

The collection is gradually growing and is open to prospective users in systematics, ecology and geography as well as applied disciplines of mycology.

Purpose

The collection is gradually growing and is opened to prospective users such as taxonomists interested in work with a particular group of fungi represented in the region and other research areas of basic and applied mycology. We support practices of actual visits for work with the collection and remote access to the database and photographs. You are kindly welcome to visit the YSU Fungarium!

Sampling Description

Study Extent

Currently the database holds 7020 collection objects, 15322 preparations, and 5 Type specimens (1 isotype, 1 holotype and 3 paratypes).

Sampling

Specimens in the collection are accumulated by direct observation and extraction of fruiting structures of fungi. The two major approaches are used: observation and collection of fruiting structures of larger fungi (macromycetes) by naked eye, and lens observations of substrates followed by extraction of smaller fruiting structures of discomycetes, hyphomycetes, pyrenomycetes etc. A common procedure of collecting, describing and preserving specimens recommended for inventories of macrofungi is used (Mueller et al., 2004, Biodiversity of fungi).

Quality Control

27% of the collection specimens have been cited in one to four publications. A total of 107 publications are linked to specimens in the database, including journal papers, descriptions in the Red Book and publications of specimens in Internet mycological forums (AscoFrance, MushroomObserver, iNaturalist and others). The collections are made by the trained mycologists or amateur mycologists, the total number of collectors – 14, the majority of specimens (87%) in the collection were collected by one person (Filippova N.). Identification was performed by a total of 30 specialists through direct work in the Fungarium (Filippova N., Bulyonkova T. – a total of 5150 specimens), in other laboratories with loaned material (Zmitrovich I. – 50 specimens, Rebriev Yu. – 34, Novozhilov Yu. – 9, Khimich Yu. – 27, Popov E. – 15, Blagoveschenskaya E. – 12, and others), or making comments on identification through Internet mycological forums (Baral H. – 27 specimens, and others). About 20% of the collection specimens are currently not identified to the species rank (representatives of the systematically complex groups, like Russula, Cortinarius, Mycena, Entoloma, Inocybe, Clitocybe, and others).

Method steps

  1. Fruitbodies of larger fungi are photographed and their growing conditions are described in the field, extracted from the substrate and packed in aluminium foil to be processed in the laboratory later on the day of collection.
  2. Macro-morphological features of sporocarps are described according to schemes required for specific systematic groups.
  3. Spore prints are obtained when the number of sporocarps is sufficient.
  4. Sporocarps are dried after processing in a drying oven under 50°C and stored as dry specimens in Ziploc bags and kraft-paper envelopes.
  5. The preparations are made from vital or dried specimens soaked in tap water, ammonia, or KOH (10%), with dyes when necessary (Melzer solution and Congo red).
  6. Microscopical characters are studied using a Zeiss Stemi-2000C stereomicroscope (providing a magnification from 6x to 50x), and Zeiss Axiostar transmitted light microscope (50x to 1000x) with Achromat 5/0.12, 10/0.25, 40/0.65 (dry) and Achromat 100/1.25 (oil immersion) lenses.
  7. Microphotographs are obtained under transmitted light microscopes using a AxioCam ERc5c digital camera and processed with AxioVision software.
  8. Measurements made using AxioVision software.

Taxonomic Coverages

The total number of species represented – 1205, genera represented – 460, families represented – 154. The majority of the specimens in the YSU Fungarium belong to the Basidiomycota (about 86%), less to Ascomycota (12%) with few specimens of Zygomycota and Myxomycota. The largest classes are the Agaricomycetes (85%), Leotiomycetes (5%), and Pezizomycetes (4%); the other 11 classes are represented by less than 70 specimens. A total of 41 orders are represented , with Agaricales (66%), Russulales (8%), Helotiales (4%), Pezizales (4%) and Boletales (4%). The Fungarium of the YSU represents 154 families, of which 14% and 18% belong to the families Cortinariaceae and Strophariaceae, respectively. They are followed by the Mycenaceae (6%), Tricholomataceae (6%), Hymenogastraceae (4%), Pluteaceae (4%), Inocybaceae (4%), Agaricaceae (3%), Omphalotaceae (3%), Entolomataceae (3%) with the rest of families representing less than 2%. The collection includes 460 genera, notably Cortinarius (976 specimens), Mycena (364 specimens), Russula (365), Pluteus (278), Galerina (210), Entoloma (186) and Lactarius (166 specimens).
  1. Fungi
    rank: kingdom
  2. Mycetozoa
    rank: kingdom

Geographic Coverages

Specimens deposited in the YSU Fungarium were collected mainly in the taiga zone of Western Siberia (Russia). The majority of specimens were collected in Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Okrug-Yugra (94%), 150 specimens from Tomskaya oblast, and several dozens of specimens from Irkutskaya, Moskovskaya, Murmanskaya oblast and from Altay, while the rest four regions represented by a few specimens (Krasnoyarskiy Kray, Novosibirskaya Oblast’, Respublica Buryatia, Tyumenskaya Oblast’). Within administrative borders of Yugra, 6 districts are represented with majority (98%) from Khanty-Mansiyskiy district. The two main sampling areas are located in the vicinities of Khanty-Mansiysk (60N 68E) and the nearby Shapsha and Mukhrino field stations of the YSU. Major vegetation types covered by the collection are coniferous dark taiga forests and their deciduous derivates (more than half of the collection), and ombrotrophic raised bogs (comprising about 30% of the collection). Coniferous forests (dominated by Pinus sibirica, Picea obovata, and Abies sibirica) and their deciduous successions (Populus tremula, Betula pubescens) are characteristic for the taiga zone of Western Siberia. The region is highly bogged, with ombrotrophic peatlands covering about 50% of the area. Other major landscapes include floodplains of big rivers, where meadow and floodplain shrub vegetation develops.

Bibliographic Citations

  1. Filippova N.V., Lapshina E.D. 2016. Коллекция ваучерных образцов грибов ЮГУ: значение и основы функционирования (Reference collection of fungi of YSU – importance and operation). In: Biological collections of Yugra: collecting, fixation, storage and scientific use. Proceedings of the scientific-methodological seminar (Биологические коллекции Югры: сбор, фиксация, хранение, введение в научный оборот. Материалы научно-петодического семинара в Музее Природы и Человека. Ханты-Мансийск. 27 марта 2015 г. \ под ред. Белогай О.И., Скучас Ю.В.). Khanty-Mansiysk, 27 march 2015. P. 73-85. -
  2. Filippova N.V., Bulyonkova T.M. 2016. Fungarium of Yugra State University. In: Biological collections of Yugra: collecting, fixation, storage and scientific use. Proceedings of the scientific-methodological seminar (Биологические коллекции Югры: сбор, фиксация, хранение, введение в научный оборот. Материалы научно-петодического семинара в Музее Природы и Человека. Ханты-Мансийск. 27 марта 2015 г. \ под ред. Белогай О.И., Скучас Ю.В.). Khanty-Mansiysk, 27 march 2015. P. 90-98. -
  3. Filippova N, Ganasevich G, Filippov I, Meshcheryakova A, Lapshina E, Karpov D (2022) Yugra State University Biological Collection (Khanty-Mansiysk, Russia): general and digitisation overview. Biodiversity Data Journal 10: e77669. https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.10.e77669 - https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.10.e77669

Contacts

Nina Filippova
originator
position: senior researcher
Yugra State University
Stroiteley street, 2
Khanty-Mansiysk
628508
Shapsha village, Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Okrug-Yugra
email: filippova.courlee.nina@gmail.com
homepage: https://fungariumysu.org/
Nina Filippova
metadata author
position: senior researcher
Yugra State University
Stroiteley street, 2
Khanty-Mansiysk
628508
Shapsha village, Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Okrug-Yugra
email: filippova.courlee.nina@gmail.com
homepage: https://fungariumysu.org/
Nina Filippova
administrative point of contact
position: senior researcher
Yugra State University
Stroiteley street, 2
Khanty-Mansiys
628508
Shapsha village, Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Okrug-Yugra
RU
email: filippova.courlee.nina@gmail.com
homepage: https://fungariumysu.org/
What is GBIF? API FAQ Newsletter Privacy Terms and agreements Citation Code of Conduct Acknowledgements
Contact GBIF Secretariat Universitetsparken 15 DK-2100 Copenhagen Ø Denmark