eButterfly Species List
Citation
Larrivée M, McFarland K (2023). eButterfly Species List. Version 1.5. Vermont Center for Ecostudies. Checklist dataset https://doi.org/10.15468/kxkzcd accessed via GBIF.org on 2024-04-27.Description
Checklist of butterflies derived from eButterfly surveysSampling Description
Study Extent
eButterfly users conduct butterfly checklist surveys anywhere they choose from Panama and the Caribbean islands, west to Hawaii and north to arctic Canada and Alaska.Sampling
An observer(s) are asked to checklist survey butterflies. They visit a site and find and count as many butterflies as possible. Effort is tracked by the distance walked or area searched. Amount of time searching is recorded. Incidental observations - observing butterflies was not their primary purpose or they lack information about how many other butterfly species are in the area during the observation period (e.g.butterflying while driving or gardening- are also accepted.Quality Control
Observers are encouraged to photograph every species they encounter, rare or common, to act as vouchers for their observations. eButterfly encourages participants to submit photos of their observations as vouchers for species verification. Photographs are processed in a way that is comparable to how a natural history museum traditionally works with a specimen. The eButterfly participant is analogous to the collector, the crowd-sourced identification system is analogous to the determiner, and eButterfly acts as the curator. eButterfly users validate or suggest corrections to observations with and without photographs based on species’ known ranges and phenology. Additionally, eButterfly users can add identifications and report and comment on others’ observations, and this provides another mechanism for increased data quality.Method steps
- eButterfly documents the presence or presumed absence of species as well as abundance through checklist data. To report butterfly observations, a web interface engages participants to submit observations through three interactive steps. After logging into their eButterfly account to enter observations, participants are asked where they observed butterflies using an online mapping tool to select an existing or new location. Step two asks participants to indicate which of four different protocols they used to count butterflies. Traveling and area counts are effort-based sampling protocols, which require submitting both the amount of time spent butterfly watching and the distance traveled or area searched. Timed counts lack the spatial component and only record the total amount of time spent observing butterflies. The fourth protocol is a less rigorous option, called ‘‘casual observation”, which requires only date, location, and species observed to describe the sampling event. Participants are encouraged to use the most rigorous protocols when possible. The final step presents a checklist of the butterflies known from the state or province where the outing occurred. The participant fills in the number of individuals seen for each species and can upload photographs they captured of those species during the outing. Although “sight only” observations are accepted, eButterfly encourages participants to include photos with their observations for species verification. Observations are tagged as photograph, specimen, or sight observations. Other ancillary information such as counts of each life stage, host plants, sex, behaviors, and other notes, can also be added. At the end of the checklist, participants are presented with a final question that asks if they are submitting a checklist of all butterflies observed during the count. This is an important question that allows data consumers to determine if this is a complete presence/presumed absence checklist, which is more informative than presence-only data.
Taxonomic Coverages
taxonomic authority: Warren, A. D., K. J. Davis, N. V. Grishin, J. P. Pelham, E. M. Stangeland. 2012. Interactive Listing of American Butterflies. http://www.butterfliesofamerica.com/
-
Papilionoideacommon name: Butterflies rank: superfamily
Geographic Coverages
eButterfly surveys are world wide
Bibliographic Citations
- Prudic, K.L.; McFarland, K.P.; Oliver, J.C.; Hutchinson, R.A.; Long, E.C.; Kerr, J.T.; Larrivée, M. (2017) eButterfly: Leveraging Massive Online Citizen Science for Butterfly Conservation. Insects 8 (2), 53. - https://doi.org/10.3390/insects8020053
- Larrivee M, Prudic KL, McFarland KP, Zhang, X. and J Kerr 2020. eButterfly: a citizen-based butterfly database in the biological sciences. http://www.e-butterfly.org - http://www.e-butterfly.org
- Soroye, P., Ahmed, N., & Kerr, J. T. (2018). Opportunistic citizen science data transform understanding of species distributions, phenology, and diversity gradients for global change research. Global change biology, 24(11), 5281-5291. - https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14358
Contacts
Maxim Larrivéeoriginator
position: Director
Insectarium de Montréal - Espace pour la vie
Quebec
CA
email: maxim.larrivee@ville.montreal.qc.ca
userId: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2925-3736
Kent McFarland
originator
position: Conservation Biologist
Vermont Center for Ecostudies
PO Box 420
Norwich
05055
Vermont
US
Telephone: (802) 649-1431
email: kmcfarland@vtecostudies.org
userId: http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7809-5503
Kent McFarland
metadata author
position: Software developer
Vermont Center for Ecostudies
20 Palmer Ct
White River Junction
05001
Vermont
US
Telephone: (802) 649-1431
email: kmcfarland@vtecostudies.org
homepage: https://val.vtecostudies.org
userId: http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7809-5503
Maxim Larrivée
administrative point of contact
position: Director
Insectarium de Montréal - Espace pour la vie
Quebec
CA
email: maxim.larrivee@ville.montreal.qc.ca
userId: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2925-3736
Kent McFarland
administrative point of contact
position: conservation biologist
Vermont Center for Ecostudies
PO Box 420
Norwich
05055
Vermont
US
Telephone: 802-649-1431
email: kmcfarland@vtecostudies.org
userId: http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7809-5503