{{nav.loginGreeting}}
  • Get data
      • Occurrences
      • GBIF API
      • Species
      • Datasets
      • Occurrence snapshots
      • Hosted portals
      • Trends
  • How-to
    • Share data

      • Quick-start guide
      • Dataset classes
      • Data hosting
      • Standards
      • Become a publisher
      • Data quality
      • Data papers
    • Use data

      • Featured data use
      • Citation guidelines
      • GBIF citations
      • Citation widget
      • Guides and documentation
  • Tools
    • Publishing

      • IPT
      • Data validator
      • GeoPick
      • New data model
      • GRSciColl
      • Suggest a dataset
      • Metabarcoding data toolkit
    • Data access and use

      • Hosted portals
      • Scientific collections
      • Data processing
      • Derived datasets
      • rgbif
      • pygbif
      • MAXENT
      • Tools catalogue
    • GBIF labs

      • Species matching
      • Name parser
      • Sequence ID
      • Relative observation trends
      • GBIF data blog
  • Community
    • Network

      • Participant network
      • Nodes
      • Publishers
      • Network contacts
      • Community forum
      • alliance for biodiversity knowledge
    • Volunteers

      • Mentors
      • Ambassadors
      • Translators
      • Citizen scientists
    • Activities

      • Capacity development
      • Programmes & projects
      • Training and learning resources
      • Data Use Club
      • Living Atlases
  • About
    • Inside GBIF

      • What is GBIF?
      • Become a member
      • Governance
      • Strategic framework
      • Work Programme
      • Funders
      • Partnerships
      • Release notes
      • Contacts
    • News & outreach

      • News
      • Subscribe
      • Events
      • Awards
      • Science Review
      • Data use
      • Thematic communities
  • User profile

Phytoplankton, National Monitoring Study 2019, EMBLAS Plus Project

Citation

Grandova M G, Terenko G, Neprokin O (2023). Phytoplankton, National Monitoring Study 2019, EMBLAS Plus Project. Version 1.4. Ukrainian Scientific Centre of Ecology of the Sea (UkrSCES). Sampling event dataset https://doi.org/10.15468/nthd7m accessed via GBIF.org on 2025-05-12.

Description

Phytoplankton data: species composition, volume of the cell [µm3], abundance [*1000cells/l], biomass (mg/m3) and Carbon biomass collected during the National Monitoring Study (NMS_UA 2019) in the Ukrainian waters (North-Western part of the Black Sea) onboard the Vessel “Auguste Piccard”, (Ukraine) in August-October 2019

Sampling Description

Method steps

Taxonomic Coverages

  1. Bacillariophyceae, Chlorodendrophyceae, Chlorophyceae, Chrysophyceae, Cryptophyceae, Cyanophyceae, Dictyochophyceae, Dinophyceae, Ebriophyceae, Euglenoidea, Imbricatea, Prasinophyceae, Prymnesiophyceae, Trebouxiophyceae, Ulvophyceae, Xanthophyceae
    rank: class

Geographic Coverages

"Data collected within the EMBLAS-Plus “EU-UNDP Project 'Improving Environmental Monitoring in the Black Sea' (EMBLAS-Plus)” (http://emblasproject.org/). Quantitative phytoplankton samples (35 samples at 20 stations) were collected by vertical series consisting from several sampling depths, so that the material could be collected from main hydrophysical layers. Layers at each station were identified according to CTD-sounding, conducted prior the phytoplankton sampling. Special attention was paid to fluorescence profile obtained simultaneously with the CTD-sounding. Depending on the features of the station, the samples in NMS were collected from upper mixed (0-1m) layer, upper thermocline layer, lower thermocline layer, near-bottom layer. Were used 5L Niskis bottles, attached to CTD rosette system for sampling at each depth; 1-2 L water samples were taken during NMS. Samples of the phytoplankton were fixed with 4% buffered formaldehyde up to the final concentration of 2% in a sample and delivered to the laboratory. After sedimentation of the phytoplankton cells during 2 weeks, samples were slowly decanted to 30-40 ml. These concentrated samples were kept at temperature of 5-7 oC during a month before further processing. Before counting, the concentrated samples were concentrated one more time, down to 10-20 cm3 by slow decantation. Identification of species and cells counting were carried out under a light microscope with magnifications of 600 in the drop with the volume of 0.05 ml (Naguotte chamber). The wet biomass was calculated by the method of geometric similarity equating shapes of cells to corresponding geometrical shapes and assuming that the cell density is equal to 1. Species were identified mainly using Schiller (1937), Kisselew (1950), Carmelo (1997), Steidinger and Tangen (1997), Cronberg and Annadotter (2006) and the taxonomic nomenclature according to the on-line data-base of World Register of Marine Species (WoRMS) and the Black Sea check-list http://phyto.bss.ibss.org.ua."

Bibliographic Citations

Contacts

Mariya Grandova Grandova
originator
position: Scientific researcher
Ukrainian Scientific Centre of Ecology of the Sea (UkrSCES)
Galina Terenko
originator
position: Scientific researcher
Ukrainian Scientific Centre of Ecology of the Sea (UkrSCES)
Oleksandr Neprokin
metadata author
position: Head of Department
Ukrainian Scientific Centre of Ecology of the Sea (UkrSCES)
email: o.neprokin@gmail.com
Oleksandr Neprokin
user
position: Head of Department
Ukrainian Scientific Centre of Ecology of the Sea (UkrSCES)
email: o.neprokin@gmail.com
Oleksandr Neprokin
administrative point of contact
position: Head of Department
Ukrainian Scientific Centre of Ecology of the Sea (UkrSCES)
What is GBIF? API FAQ Newsletter Privacy Terms and agreements Citation Code of Conduct Acknowledgements
Contact GBIF Secretariat Universitetsparken 15 DK-2100 Copenhagen Ø Denmark
GBIF is a Global Core Biodata Resource