We’re sorry, but GBIF doesn’t work properly without JavaScript enabled.
Our website has detected that you are using an outdated insecure browser that will prevent you from using the site. We suggest you upgrade to a modern browser.
{{nav.loginGreeting}}
  • Get data
      • Occurrences
      • GBIF API
      • Species
      • Datasets
      • Occurrence snapshots
      • Hosted portals
      • Trends
  • How-to
    • Share data

      • Quick-start guide
      • Dataset classes
      • Data hosting
      • Standards
      • Become a publisher
      • Data quality
      • Data papers
    • Use data

      • Featured data use
      • Citation guidelines
      • GBIF citations
      • Citation widget
  • Tools
    • Publishing

      • IPT
      • Data validator
      • Scientific Collections
      • Suggest a dataset
      • New data model ⭐️
    • Data access and use

      • Hosted portals
      • Data processing
      • Derived datasets
      • rgbif
      • pygbif
      • MAXENT
      • Tools catalogue
    • GBIF labs

      • Species matching
      • Name parser
      • Sequence ID
      • Relative observation trends
      • GBIF data blog
  • Community
    • Network

      • Participant network
      • Nodes
      • Publishers
      • Network contacts
      • Community forum
      • alliance for biodiversity knowledge
    • Volunteers

      • Mentors
      • Ambassadors
      • Translators
      • Citizen scientists
    • Activities

      • Capacity enhancement
      • Programmes & projects
      • Training and learning resources
      • Data Use Club
      • Living Atlases
  • About
    • Inside GBIF

      • What is GBIF?
      • Become a member
      • Governance
      • Implementation plan
      • Work Programme
      • Funders
      • Partnerships
      • Release notes
      • Contacts
    • News & outreach

      • News
      • Newsletters and lists
      • Events
      • Ebbe Nielsen Challenge
      • Graduate Researchers Award
      • Science Review
      • Data use
  • User profile

Methanogens and iron-reducing bacteria are major contributors to mercury methylation in boreal lake sediments

Dataset homepage

Citation

MGnify (2019). Methanogens and iron-reducing bacteria are major contributors to mercury methylation in boreal lake sediments. Sampling event dataset https://doi.org/10.15468/a3cnlo accessed via GBIF.org on 2023-01-27.

Description

Methylmercury is a potent human neurotoxin easily biomagnified in aquatic food webs. Anaerobic microorganisms containing the hgcA gene potentially mediate the formation of methylmercury in natural environments, but the diversity of microbial mercury methylating communities in the environment remains largely unexplored. The diversity of mercury methylating microbial communities in boreal lake sediments, encompassing a wide range of mercury methylation rates, was characterized using barcoded amplification and high throughput sequencing of 16S rRNA and hgcA genes. Previously, most studies in aquatic ecosystems have implicated sulphate-reducing bacteria as the main mercury methylators. Here we demonstrate that Methanomicrobiales contribute significantly to the hgcA gene pool in boreal lake sediments. Experimental mercury isotope tracer incubations confirmed that, while sulphate-reducers contribute to mercury methylation, methanogens and iron reducers are also quantitatively important for the process. Our results change the way we perceive the local and global diversity of mercury methylating microbial communities in boreal lake sediments and call for further studies on the environmental factors regulating mercury methylation.

Sampling Description

Sampling

Methylmercury is a potent human neurotoxin easily biomagnified in aquatic food webs. Anaerobic microorganisms containing the hgcA gene potentially mediate the formation of methylmercury in natural environments, but the diversity of microbial mercury methylating communities in the environment remains largely unexplored. The diversity of mercury methylating microbial communities in boreal lake sediments, encompassing a wide range of mercury methylation rates, was characterized using barcoded amplification and high throughput sequencing of 16S rRNA and hgcA genes. Previously, most studies in aquatic ecosystems have implicated sulphate-reducing bacteria as the main mercury methylators. Here we demonstrate that Methanomicrobiales contribute significantly to the hgcA gene pool in boreal lake sediments. Experimental mercury isotope tracer incubations confirmed that, while sulphate-reducers contribute to mercury methylation, methanogens and iron reducers are also quantitatively important for the process. Our results change the way we perceive the local and global diversity of mercury methylating microbial communities in boreal lake sediments and call for further studies on the environmental factors regulating mercury methylation.

Method steps

  1. Pipeline used: https://www.ebi.ac.uk/metagenomics/pipelines/4.1

Taxonomic Coverages

Geographic Coverages

Bibliographic Citations

  1. Bravo AG, Peura S, Buck M, Ahmed O, Mateos-Rivera A, Herrero Ortega S, Schaefer JK, Bouchet S, Tolu J, Björn E, Bertilsson S. 2018. Methanogens and Iron-Reducing Bacteria: the Overlooked Members of Mercury-Methylating Microbial Communities in Boreal Lakes. Appl Environ Microbiol vol. 84 - DOI:10.1128/aem.01774-18

Contacts

originator
UPPSALA UNIVERSITY/IEG/LIMNOLOGY
metadata author
UPPSALA UNIVERSITY/IEG/LIMNOLOGY
administrative point of contact
UPPSALA UNIVERSITY/IEG/LIMNOLOGY
What is GBIF? API FAQ Newsletter Privacy Terms and agreements Citation Code of Conduct Acknowledgements
Contact GBIF Secretariat Universitetsparken 15 DK-2100 Copenhagen Ø Denmark