We’re sorry, but GBIF doesn’t work properly without JavaScript enabled.
Our website has detected that you are using an outdated insecure browser that will prevent you from using the site. We suggest you upgrade to a modern browser.
{{nav.loginGreeting}}
  • Get data
      • Occurrences
      • GBIF API
      • Species
      • Datasets
      • Occurrence snapshots
      • Hosted portals
      • Trends
  • How-to
    • Share data

      • Quick-start guide
      • Dataset classes
      • Data hosting
      • Standards
      • Become a publisher
      • Data quality
      • Data papers
    • Use data

      • Featured data use
      • Citation guidelines
      • GBIF citations
      • Citation widget
  • Tools
    • Publishing

      • IPT
      • Data validator
      • Scientific Collections
      • Suggest a dataset
      • New data model ⭐️
    • Data access and use

      • Hosted portals
      • Data processing
      • Derived datasets
      • rgbif
      • pygbif
      • MAXENT
      • Tools catalogue
    • GBIF labs

      • Species matching
      • Name parser
      • Sequence ID
      • Relative observation trends
      • GBIF data blog
  • Community
    • Network

      • Participant network
      • Nodes
      • Publishers
      • Network contacts
      • Community forum
      • alliance for biodiversity knowledge
    • Volunteers

      • Mentors
      • Ambassadors
      • Translators
      • Citizen scientists
    • Activities

      • Capacity enhancement
      • Programmes & projects
      • Training and learning resources
      • Data Use Club
      • Living Atlases
  • About
    • Inside GBIF

      • What is GBIF?
      • Become a member
      • Governance
      • Implementation plan
      • Work Programme
      • Funders
      • Partnerships
      • Release notes
      • Contacts
    • News & outreach

      • News
      • Newsletters and lists
      • Events
      • Ebbe Nielsen Challenge
      • Graduate Researchers Award
      • Science Review
      • Data use
  • User profile

Cryoconite sediments Targeted Locus (Loci)

Dataset homepage

Citation

MGnify (2019). Cryoconite sediments Targeted Locus (Loci). Sampling event dataset https://doi.org/10.15468/qmjm6v accessed via GBIF.org on 2023-03-31.

Description

Biological processes on glacier surfaces affect the physical behaviour of glaciers and ice sheets and carbon and nutrient fluxes in the cryosphere. Changes in rates of biological processes are often associated with changes in diversity, yet there is little knowledge of the diversity of active microbes on glacier surfaces and its controls. We examined the microbial abundance, community structure, and the proportion of the active microbes at two contrasting surface sites located at the margin and in the interior of the Greenland ice sheet over the course of a melting season, using DNA and RNA co-extraction from the same samples, quantitative PCR and pyrosequencing of 16S rRNA and rDNA. Whereas the rDNA abundances were similar at both sites (108 109 copies g-1), the rRNA abundance was significantly higher in the interior (1010 copies g-1). Significant differences in diversity were found between the sites, with the DNA diversity significantly higher at the margin and the RNA diversity higher at the interior site. The bulk of the active communities at both sites comprised Cyanobacteria and Alpha- and Betaproteobacteria, suggesting a truncated food web structure dominated by few bacterial primary producers and decomposers. We suggest that the ice sheet margin contains a more diverse but less active assemblage of microbes while the interior harbours a less diverse but well-adapted active community. We propose that the process of community assembly at the surface of the GrIS can be understood as species sorting from a metacommunity of airborne microbes which land on the ice surface.

Sampling Description

Sampling

Biological processes on glacier surfaces affect the physical behaviour of glaciers and ice sheets and carbon and nutrient fluxes in the cryosphere. Changes in rates of biological processes are often associated with changes in diversity, yet there is little knowledge of the diversity of active microbes on glacier surfaces and its controls. We examined the microbial abundance, community structure, and the proportion of the active microbes at two contrasting surface sites located at the margin and in the interior of the Greenland ice sheet over the course of a melting season, using DNA and RNA co-extraction from the same samples, quantitative PCR and pyrosequencing of 16S rRNA and rDNA. Whereas the rDNA abundances were similar at both sites (108 109 copies g-1), the rRNA abundance was significantly higher in the interior (1010 copies g-1). Significant differences in diversity were found between the sites, with the DNA diversity significantly higher at the margin and the RNA diversity higher at the interior site. The bulk of the active communities at both sites comprised Cyanobacteria and Alpha- and Betaproteobacteria, suggesting a truncated food web structure dominated by few bacterial primary producers and decomposers. We suggest that the ice sheet margin contains a more diverse but less active assemblage of microbes while the interior harbours a less diverse but well-adapted active community. We propose that the process of community assembly at the surface of the GrIS can be understood as species sorting from a metacommunity of airborne microbes which land on the ice surface.

Method steps

  1. Pipeline used: https://www.ebi.ac.uk/metagenomics/pipelines/4.1

Taxonomic Coverages

Geographic Coverages

Bibliographic Citations

Contacts

originator
GEUS
metadata author
GEUS
administrative point of contact
GEUS
What is GBIF? API FAQ Newsletter Privacy Terms and agreements Citation Code of Conduct Acknowledgements
Contact GBIF Secretariat Universitetsparken 15 DK-2100 Copenhagen Ø Denmark