Global Register of Introduced and Invasive Species - Brazil
Citation
Ziller S, Zenni R, Souza Bastos L, Possato Rossi V, Wong L J, Pagad S (2020). Global Register of Introduced and Invasive Species - Brazil. Version 1.5. Invasive Species Specialist Group ISSG. Checklist dataset https://doi.org/10.15468/i0avrm accessed via GBIF.org on 2024-10-12.Description
The Global Register of Introduced and Invasive Species (GRIIS) presents validated and verified national checklists of introduced (alien) and invasive alien species at the country, territory, and associated island level. Checklists are living entities, especially for biological invasions given the growing nature of the problem. GRIIS checklists are based on a published methodology and supported by the Integrated Publishing Tool that jointly enable ongoing improvements and updates to expand their taxonomic coverage and completeness. Phase 1 of the project focused on developing validated and verified checklists of countries that are Party to the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD). Phase 2 aimed to achieve global coverage including non-party countries and all overseas territories of countries, e.g. those of the Netherlands, France, and the United Kingdom. All kingdoms of organisms occurring in all environments and systems are covered. Checklists are reviewed and verified by networks of country or species experts. Verified checklists/ species records, as well as those under review, are presented on the online GRIIS website (www.griis.org) in addition to being published through the GBIF Integrated Publishing Tool.Purpose
The resource will be a support to countries to make progress to achieve Aichi Biodiversity Target 9 -in the development of their National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plans, their National Invasive Alien Species Strategy and Action Plan, target setting and monitoring.
Sampling Description
Study Extent
The geographic focus of this checklist is the BrazilSampling
This annotated checklist is focused on introduced (alien) and invasive species that are known to occur in Brazil. The International Union for Conservation of Nature, (IUCN) describes an Introduced/ Alien and Invasive alien species as follows:An Introduced or Alien species means a species, subspecies, or lower taxon occurring outside of its natural range (past or present) and dispersal potential (i.e. outside the range it occupies naturally or could not occupy without direct or indirect introduction or care by humans) and includes any part, gametes or propagule of such species that might survive and subsequently reproduce. An Invasive Alien Species is an alien species which becomes established in natural or semi-natural ecosystems or habitat, is an agent of change, and threatens native biological diversity. In GRIIS, species are recorded as having an impact (as 'yes' under 'isInvasive') if there is evidence of the species negatively impacting biodiversity, and including species that are widespread, spreading rapidly or present in high abundance (Pagad et al. 2018). This usage is relevant to the purpose of GRIIS, and consistent with the concept of impact as formulated by Parker et al. (1999) and now widely used (e.g. Didham et al. 2005, Strayer et al. 2006, McGeoch et al. 2010, 2012, Vila et al. 2011), where impact is a function not only of the per capita effect of an individual organism, but is a combined function of the effect, abundance and range size of a species. Impact can of course be defined in different ways, driven by different objectives, such as its usage in EICAT where it is defined as a measurable change to the properties of an ecosystem caused by an alien taxon (Hawkins et al. 2015).
Quality Control
The draft checklist is compiled by collating data and information through a comprehensive literature overview. Additional steps implemented to control the quality of the data are described below. Taxonomic harmonization and normalization using the GBIF taxonomic backbone To harmonize all species names across countries, species lists are subjected to a normalization process in which taxon rank and taxonomic status are identified and assigned. Spelling and other errors in assigning species authorship are also corrected. Data validation The Project Personnel complete a review and validate all the annotations, especially those on provenance and 'invasive' status of the species based on evidence of impact. Data verification The checklist is submitted to a network of country editors for a review of both accuracy of records, annotations, and identification of any significant gaps in the data. Data verification is an iterative process and the activity for a particular version is declared complete on agreement of all relevant country editors (see versioning details below). One of the key tenets of the GRIIS project has been engagement with country editors in the verification process and as custodians of country checklists. While this has been possible in the majority of countries, for a small number of countries this engagement process has not succeeded in delivering a verified checklist. In these cases, the GRIIS Project Personnel have completed the validation of the species records but continue to work towards identifying country experts.Method steps
- Data collation and categorization Data filtering and categorization/ classification Taxonomic harmonization and normalization Data validation Data verification
- The published methods underpinning GRIIS and each checklist are described in Pagad et al 2018.
Additional info
Versioning The GRIIS checklists are dynamic and reflect the latest known status of alien and invasive species presence and impacts. The original versions of each country checklist (v1.0) undergo two potential types of updates: 1. Major updates: These happen when batches of new species or records become available, usually addressing multiple taxonomic groups simultaneously. Each checklist is assigned a new version number after a major update (e.g. from v1.0 to v2.0). 2. Incremental updates: These are smaller ongoing updates involving the addition of new species or records based on new publications as well as taxonomic or other updates. Incremental updates to a checklist are associated with a subversion number, e.g. v1.1. The checklist version number is visible/available on the citation.Taxonomic Coverages
Animalia, Bacteria, Chromista, Fungi, Plantae, Protozoa, Viruses
-
Animaliarank: kingdom
-
Bacteriarank: kingdom
-
Chromistarank: kingdom
-
Fungirank: kingdom
-
Plantaerank: kingdom
-
Protozoarank: kingdom
-
Virusesrank: kingdom
Geographic Coverages
Brazil
Bibliographic Citations
- Hamer, M., Victor, J., Smith, G.F. (2012). Best Practice Guide for Compiling, Maintaining and Disseminating National Species Checklists, version 1.0, released in October 2012. Copenhagen: Global Biodiversity Information Facility, 40 pp, ISBN: 87-92020-48-8, Accessible at http://www.gbif.org/orc/?doc_id=4752. -
- Pagad S, Genovesi P, Carnevali L, Schigel D, McGeoch MA (2018) Introducing the Global Register of Introduced and Invasive Species. Scientific Data, 5, 170202. https://www.nature.com/articles/sdata2017202 -
- Parker I, Simberloff D, Lonsdale W. et al. (1999) Impact: Toward a Framework for Understanding the Ecological Effects of Invaders. Biological Invasions 1, 3–19 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010034312781 -
- Didham RK, Tylianakis JM, Hutchison MA, Ewers RM, Gemmell NJ. (2005) Are invasive species the drivers of ecological change? Trends Ecol Evol. 2005 Sep;20(9):470-4. Epub 2005 Jul 21. -
- Strayer DL, Eviner VT, Jeschke JM, Pace ML. (2006) Understanding the long-term effects of species invasions. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 21(11):645-51 -
- McGeoch MA, Butchart SHM, Spear D, Marais E. Kleynhans EJ, Symes A, Chanson J, Hoffmann M. (2010) Global indicators of biological invasion: species numbers, biodiversity impact and policy responses. Diversity and Distributions Volume16, Issue1 January 2010. -
- McGeoch, M.A., Spear, D., Kleynhans, E.J. & Marais, E. 2012. Uncertainty in invasive alien species listing. Ecological Applications 22, 959-971. 10.1890/11-1252.1 -
- Vilà M, Espinar JL, Hejda M, Hulme PE, Jarošík V, Maron JL, Pergl J, Schaffner U, Sun Y, Pyšek P. (2011) Ecological impacts of invasive alien plants: a meta‐analysis of their effects on species, communities and ecosystems. Ecology Letters Volume14, Issue7 July 2011 Pages 702-708 -
- Hawkins CL, Bacher S, Essl F, Hulme PE, Jeschke JM, Kühn I, Kumschick S, Nentwig W, Pergl J, Pyšek P, Rabitsch W, Richardson DM, Vilà M, Wilson JRU, Genovesi P, Blackburn TM. (2015) Framework and guidelines for implementing the proposed IUCN Environmental Impact Classification for Alien Taxa (EICAT) Diversity and Distributions Volume21, Issue11 November 2015 Pages 1360-1363 -
- Agudo-Padrón, A. I. (2011). "Exotic molluscs (Mollusca, Gastropoda et Bivalvia) in Santa Catarina State, Southern Brazil region: check list and regional spatial distribution." Biodiversity Journal 2(2): 53-58. -
- Alves, M., et al. (2010). The Example 0F Brazil. Diversity, Phylogeny, and Evolution in the Monocotyledons: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on the Comparative Biology of the Monocotyledons and the Fifth International Symposium on Grass Systematics and Evolution, Aarhus Universitetsforlag. -
- Barbosa, N. P., et al. (2010). "Distribution of non-native invasive species and soil properties in proximity to paved roads and unpaved roads in a quartzitic mountainous grassland of southeastern Brazil (rupestrian fields)." Biological Invasions 12(11): 3745-3755. -
- Braks, M., et al. (2004). "Interspecific competition between two invasive species of container mosquitoes, Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae), in Brazil." Annals of the Entomological Society of America 97(1): 130-139. -
- Botanical Garden Research Institute of Rio de Janeiro (2016) Flora of Brazil 2020 -
- Botanical Garden - Federal University of Santa Maria (2016) List of species http://w3.ufsm.br/jbsm/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/LISTA-ESPÉCIES-JBSM-2010.pdf -
- Carniatto, N., et al. (2013). "Effects of an invasive alien Poaceae on aquatic macrophytes and fish communities in a Neotropical reservoir." Biotropica 45(6): 747-754. -
- Cavalcanti, F. F., et al. (2013). "Population dynamics of cryptogenic calcarean sponges (P orifera, C alcarea) in S outheastern B razil." Marine Ecology 34(3): 280-288. -
- Environmental Institute of Paraná (undated) Official List of Invasive Species in Paraná -
- Farrapeira, C. M. (2009). "Barnacles (Crustacea: Cirripedia) of the estuarine and marine areas of the port of Recife (Pernambuco, Brazil)." Cahiers de biologie marine 50(2): 119-129. -
- Fonseca, C. R., et al. (2013). "Invasive alien plants in the Pampas grasslands: a tri-national cooperation challenge." Biological Invasions 15(8): 1751-1763. -
- Lannes, L. S., et al. (2012). "Alien and endangered plants in the Brazilian Cerrado exhibit contrasting relationships with vegetation biomass and N: P stoichiometry." New Phytologist 196(3): 816-823. -
- Marins, F. O., et al. (2010). "Non indigenous ascidians in port and natural environments in a tropical Brazilian bay." Zoologia (Curitiba) 27(2): 213-221. -
- Neves, C. S. and R. M. d. Rocha (2008). "Introduced and cryptogenic species and their management in Paranaguá Bay, Brazil." Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology 51(3): 623-633. -
- Orsi, M. L.; Agostinho, A. A. (1999) Introduction of fish species by accidental escapes from crop tanks in rivers of the Paraná River Basin, Brazil. Brazilian Journal of Zoology 557 - 560 http://www.scielo.br/pdf/rbzool/v16n2/v16n2a20.pdf -
- Pereira, D., et al. (2014). "Bivalve distribution in hydrographic regions in South America: historical overview and conservation." Hydrobiologia 735(1): 15-44. -
- Pires, M. J. (1992). "A check-list on the invasive species of forestry plantations in lower Amazon, NW." Acta Amaz: 3-15. -
- Ragonha, F. H., et al. (2014). "First records of Freshwater Bivalves of Ilha Grande National Park, Paraná, Brazil." Iheringia. Série Zoologia 104(1): 14-20. -
- Rolim, R. G., et al. (2015). "How much do we know about distribution and ecology of naturalized and invasive alien plant species? A case study from subtropical southern Brazil." Biological Invasions 17(5): 1497-1518. -
- Santos, G. M. d. M., et al. (2012). "Invasive Africanized honeybees change the structure of native pollination networks in Brazil." Biological Invasions 14(11): 2369-2378. -
- Silveira, L. F. and F. Olmos (2013). "How many bird species are there in Brazil? Species concepts, conservation and what is to be found." Revista Brasileira de Ornitologia-Brazilian Journal of Ornithology 15(29): 8. -
- Zenni, R. D. (2014). "Analysis of introduction history of invasive plants in B razil reveals patterns of association between biogeographical origin and reason for introduction." Austral Ecology 39(4): 401-407. -
- Zenni, R. D. and S. R. Ziller (2011). "An overview of invasive plants in Brazil." Brazilian Journal of Botany 34(3): 431-446. -
Contacts
Silvia Zilleroriginator
position: Founder and Executive Director
Instituto Hórus de Desenvolvimento e Conservação Ambiental
BR
email: sziller@institutohorus.org.br
Rafael Zenni
originator
position: Professor Adjunto - Ecologia
Departamento de Biologia Universidade Federal de Lavras
BR
email: rafael.zenni@dbi.ufla.br
Laís Souza Bastos
originator
position: Research Assistant
Universidade Federal de Lavras
BR
Vinícius Possato Rossi
originator
position: Reseach Assistant
Universidade Federal de Lavras
BR
Lian Jenna Wong
originator
position: Research Assistant
Biodiversity Data Management Ltd.
NZ
email: biodivdatamgt@gmail.com
Shyama Pagad
originator
position: Deputy Chair- Information
IUCN SSC Invasive Species Specialist Group (ISSG)
NZ
email: s.pagad@auckland.ac.nz
Shyama Pagad
metadata author
position: Deputy Chair- Information
IUCN SSC Invasive Species Specialist Group (ISSG)
NZ
email: s.pagad@auckland.ac.nz
Shyama Pagad
user
email: s.pagad@auckland.ac.nz
Shyama Pagad
administrative point of contact
position: Deputy Chair- Information
IUCN SSC Invasive Species Specialist Group (ISSG)
NZ
email: s.pagad@auckland.ac.nz