We’re sorry, but GBIF doesn’t work properly without JavaScript enabled.
Our website has detected that you are using an outdated insecure browser that will prevent you from using the site. We suggest you upgrade to a modern browser.
{{nav.loginGreeting}}
  • Get data
      • Occurrences
      • GBIF API
      • Species
      • Datasets
      • Occurrence snapshots
      • Hosted portals
      • Trends
  • How-to
    • Share data

      • Quick-start guide
      • Dataset classes
      • Data hosting
      • Standards
      • Become a publisher
      • Data quality
      • Data papers
    • Use data

      • Featured data use
      • Citation guidelines
      • GBIF citations
      • Citation widget
  • Tools
    • Publishing

      • IPT
      • Data validator
      • Scientific Collections
      • Suggest a dataset
      • New data model ⭐️
    • Data access and use

      • Hosted portals
      • Data processing
      • Derived datasets
      • rgbif
      • pygbif
      • MAXENT
      • Tools catalogue
    • GBIF labs

      • Species matching
      • Name parser
      • Sequence ID
      • Relative observation trends
      • GBIF data blog
  • Community
    • Network

      • Participant network
      • Nodes
      • Publishers
      • Network contacts
      • Community forum
      • alliance for biodiversity knowledge
    • Volunteers

      • Mentors
      • Ambassadors
      • Translators
      • Citizen scientists
    • Activities

      • Capacity enhancement
      • Programmes & projects
      • Training and learning resources
      • Data Use Club
      • Living Atlases
  • About
    • Inside GBIF

      • What is GBIF?
      • Become a member
      • Governance
      • Implementation plan
      • Work Programme
      • Funders
      • Partnerships
      • Release notes
      • Contacts
    • News & outreach

      • News
      • Newsletters and lists
      • Events
      • Ebbe Nielsen Challenge
      • Graduate Researchers Award
      • Science Review
      • Data use
  • User profile

Effects of Fecal Input, Environmental Conditions, and Environmental Sources on Enterococci Concentrations in an Estuarine Ecosystem

Dataset homepage

Citation

MGnify (2019). Effects of Fecal Input, Environmental Conditions, and Environmental Sources on Enterococci Concentrations in an Estuarine Ecosystem. Sampling event dataset https://doi.org/10.15468/gs4b6q accessed via GBIF.org on 2023-01-30.

Description

To determine major factors influencing enterococci concentrations seen in an estuary and marine beach setting. More specifically delineating fecal input, environmental conditions and environmental reservoirs to determine their combined impact on enterococci concentrations.

Sampling Description

Sampling

To determine major factors influencing enterococci concentrations seen in an estuary and marine beach setting. More specifically delineating fecal input, environmental conditions and environmental reservoirs to determine their combined impact on enterococci concentrations.

Method steps

  1. Pipeline used: https://www.ebi.ac.uk/metagenomics/pipelines/4.1

Taxonomic Coverages

Geographic Coverages

Bibliographic Citations

  1. Rothenheber D, Jones S. 2018. Enterococcal Concentrations in a Coastal Ecosystem Are a Function of Fecal Source Input, Environmental Conditions, and Environmental Sources. Appl Environ Microbiol vol. 84 - DOI:10.1128/aem.01038-18

Contacts

originator
University of New Hampshire
metadata author
University of New Hampshire
administrative point of contact
University of New Hampshire
What is GBIF? API FAQ Newsletter Privacy Terms and agreements Citation Code of Conduct Acknowledgements
Contact GBIF Secretariat Universitetsparken 15 DK-2100 Copenhagen Ø Denmark