We’re sorry, but GBIF doesn’t work properly without JavaScript enabled.
Our website has detected that you are using an outdated insecure browser that will prevent you from using the site. We suggest you upgrade to a modern browser.
{{nav.loginGreeting}}
  • Get data
      • Occurrences
      • GBIF API
      • Species
      • Datasets
      • Occurrence snapshots
      • Hosted portals
      • Trends
  • How-to
    • Share data

      • Quick-start guide
      • Dataset classes
      • Data hosting
      • Standards
      • Become a publisher
      • Data quality
      • Data papers
    • Use data

      • Featured data use
      • Citation guidelines
      • GBIF citations
      • Citation widget
  • Tools
    • Publishing

      • IPT
      • Data validator
      • Scientific Collections
      • Suggest a dataset
      • New data model ⭐️
    • Data access and use

      • Hosted portals
      • Data processing
      • Derived datasets
      • rgbif
      • pygbif
      • MAXENT
      • Tools catalogue
    • GBIF labs

      • Species matching
      • Name parser
      • Sequence ID
      • Relative observation trends
      • GBIF data blog
  • Community
    • Network

      • Participant network
      • Nodes
      • Publishers
      • Network contacts
      • Community forum
      • alliance for biodiversity knowledge
    • Volunteers

      • Mentors
      • Ambassadors
      • Translators
      • Citizen scientists
    • Activities

      • Capacity enhancement
      • Programmes & projects
      • Training and learning resources
      • Data Use Club
      • Living Atlases
  • About
    • Inside GBIF

      • What is GBIF?
      • Become a member
      • Governance
      • Implementation plan
      • Work Programme
      • Funders
      • Partnerships
      • Release notes
      • Contacts
    • News & outreach

      • News
      • Newsletters and lists
      • Events
      • Ebbe Nielsen Challenge
      • Graduate Researchers Award
      • Science Review
      • Data use
  • User profile

A dataset of distribution of the Geothelphusa (Decapoda: Potamidae) with their environmental parameters and stream indicators in eastern and southern Taiwan

Citation

Huang C, Yang C (2023). A dataset of distribution of the Geothelphusa (Decapoda: Potamidae) with their environmental parameters and stream indicators in eastern and southern Taiwan. Version 1.6. Taiwan Endemic Species Research Institute. Sampling event dataset https://doi.org/10.15468/a72bfr accessed via GBIF.org on 2023-03-26.

Description

This dataset includes data of the freshwater crab genus Geothelphusa (Decapoda: Potamidae), their environmental parameters and stream indicators in eastern and southern Taiwan. This dataset is the result of 146 surveys (sampling events) of freshwater crab species and stream environment from 2013 to 2015 in 42 sampling sites throughout Taiwan, and a total of 12 species and 1,006 crabs of the Geothelphusa were recorded. The crab data include ‎existence or not, carapace width, carapace length, wet weight and sex. The stream environmental data include water temperature, pH value, dissolved oxygen, conductivity and three indicators (River Pollution Index, RPI; Water Quality Index 7, WQI7; citizen Qualitative Habitat Evaluation Index, cQHEI).

Sampling Description

Study Extent

The freshwater crabs appear in almost all clean freshwater bodies, from moist lowland forests to rugged mountains (Cumberlidge et al. 2009). There are 57 recognized Geothelphusa species, with 39 species in Taiwan (Shy et al. 2021). Over twenty Taiwanese Geothelphusa species live in stream ecosystems below 500 m above sea level (Shy and Lee 2009). In this paper, the 42 sampling sites in Taiwan (Fig. 1) are all natural habitats of streams with an elevation distribution of 2-998 m, and 33 sites (78.6%) are below 500 m altitude. The data of the 22 monitoring sites were collected quarterly from the summer of 2013 to the summer of 2015, but some surveys were abandoned due to a lack of water-related data for the drought. The other 20 sites were surveyed only once in the summer and fall of 2014.

Sampling

Crab investigation A complete search of 50 meters along the stream was conducted at each site. Then, six traps baited with dry pet food (Fig. 2) were set overnight (Chen et al. 2003) to collect the Geothelphusa crabs. After identifying species and measuring the traits of carapace breadth, carapace length, wet weight and sex, the captured crabs were released to their native habitats except for those with doubt in species identification needed for confirmation in the laboratory. Environmental parameters investigation The water temperature, pH value, dissolved oxygen and conductivity of the sampling sites were measured by a water quality meter (Horiba U-53) in situ. The water samples used to measure the values of BOD5, NH3-N, SS, FC and TP were preserved below 4 degree Celsius and analyzed in the laboratory within seven days from collection. In addition, the score table of cQHEI was also recorded in situ. The data of BOD5, NH3-N, SS, FC and TP were used to calculate two water quality indicators: River Pollution Index (Liou et al. 2004) and Water Quality Index 7 (Wen 2006). The data of the score table of cQHEI were used to calculate the other environmental indicator: the citizen Qualitative Habitat Evaluation Index (Hoosier Riverwatch 2019).

Method steps

  1. The water sampling and the seven parameters required to calculate two water quality indicators, River Pollution Index and Water Quality Index, including pH value, dissolved oxygen (DO), biochemical oxygen demand (BOD5), ammonia nitrogen (NH3-N), suspended solids (SS), fecal coliform (FC) and total phosphorus (TP), were operated following the protocols published by Taiwan Environmental Protection Administration in 2013.

Taxonomic Coverages

All the crabs were identified and recorded to species, but a few individuals labelled as "Uncertain" were too small to identify. There were 12 species and 1,006 crabs of the Geothelphusa recorded.
  1. Geothelphusa albogilva
    common name: 黃灰澤蟹 rank: species
  2. Geothelphusa bicolor
    common name: 雙色澤蟹 rank: species
  3. Geothelphusa caesia
    common name: 藍灰澤蟹 rank: species
  4. Geothelphusa cinerea
    common name: 灰甲澤蟹 rank: species
  5. Geothelphusa ferruginea
    common name: 銹色澤蟹 rank: species
  6. Geothelphusa ilan
    common name: 宜蘭澤蟹 rank: species
  7. Geothelphusa lili
    common name: 力里澤蟹 rank: species
  8. Geothelphusa olea
    common name: 黃綠澤蟹 rank: species
  9. Geothelphusa pingtung
    common name: 屏東澤蟹 rank: species
  10. Geothelphusa shernshan
    common name: 神山澤蟹 rank: species
  11. Geothelphusa tawu
    common name: 大武澤蟹 rank: species
  12. Geothelphusa tsayae
    common name: 蔡氏澤蟹 rank: species
  13. Geothelphusa
    common name: 澤蟹 rank: genus

Geographic Coverages

There were 42 study sites ranging from 120.601295 to 121.6641944 and 21.95916 to 24.75119444.

Bibliographic Citations

Contacts

ChihNan Huang
originator
position: Assistant Research Fellow
Taiwan Endemic Species Research Institute
TW
email: cnhuang@tesri.gov.tw
ChengHsiung Yang
originator
Taiwan Endemic Species Research Institute
TW
ChihNan Huang
metadata author
position: Assistant Research Fellow
Taiwan Endemic Species Research Institute
TW
email: cnhuang@tesri.gov.tw
ChihNan Huang
user
position: Assistant Research Fellow
Taiwan Endemic Species Research Institute
TW
email: cnhuang@tesri.gov.tw
ChihNan Huang
administrative point of contact
position: Assistant Research Fellow
Taiwan Endemic Species Research Institute
TW
email: cnhuang@tesri.gov.tw
ChengHsiung Yang
administrative point of contact
position: Assistant Research Fellow
Taiwan Endemic Species Research Institute
TW
What is GBIF? API FAQ Newsletter Privacy Terms and agreements Citation Code of Conduct Acknowledgements
Contact GBIF Secretariat Universitetsparken 15 DK-2100 Copenhagen Ø Denmark