Registros de aves del Valle de Aburrá asociados al estudio del análisis de la conectividad ecológica funcional y estructural en el Área Metropolitana del Valle de Aburrá

Citation

Description

Teniendo la caracterización ambiental del paisaje urbano del Valle de Aburrá a partir de variables derivadas de teledetección, se realizó una preselección de índices espectrales y escala espacial con el propósito de reducir el número de variables predictoras, eliminando correlación e incluyendo aquellas que mejor explican variación en la riqueza de especies. Con este fin, se muestrearon cuatro grupos taxonómicos de vertebrados entre ellos la avifauna del área urbana de los diez municipios que hacen parte del Área metropolitana del Valle de Aburrá (AMVA). Se seleccionaron especies, con al menos 10 detecciones, para realizar las estimaciones de ocupación y abundancia utilizando una descripción de atributos de hábitat en la escala de paisaje.

Las aves con mayor probabilidad de ocupación en el área son el azulejo Thraupis episcopus, el Sirirí Tyrannus melancholichus, la Torcaza Zenaida auriculata y la Mirla embarradora Turdus ignibilis; mientras que las de menor probabilidad de ocupación son el Carpintero Picoides fumigatus, el Parlotero Tachyphonus rufus, y el Espiguero Spinus xanthogastrus. El presente recurso contiene la información asociada a 39394 registros de aves provenientes del área urbana de los municipios de Barbosa, Bello, Caldas, Copacabana, Envigado, Girardota, Itagüí, La Estrella, Sabaneta y la ciudad de Medellín, siendo esta última la que reporta un mayor número de registros con 17442. En total, se reportan 221 especies de aves observadas para el Valle de Aburrá.

Sampling Description

Taxonomic Coverages

Geographic Coverages

Bibliographic Citations

1. Bates, A.J., J.P. Sadler, A.J. Fairbrass, S.J. Falk, J.D. Hale & T.J. Matthews. 2011. Changing bee and hoverfly pollinator assemblages along an urban-rural gradient. PLoS One 6. -
2. Bendix, J., J.J. Wiley & M.G. Commons. 2017. Intermediate disturbance and patterns of species richness. Phys. Geogr. 38: 393–403. -
3. Beninde, J., M. Veith & A. Hochkirch. 2015. Biodiversity in cities needs space: A meta-analysis of factors determining intra-urban biodiversity variation. Ecol. Lett. 18: 581–592. -
4. Bickford, D., T.H. Ng, L. Qie, E.P. Kudavidanage & C.J.A. Bradshaw. 2010. Forest fragment and breeding habitat characteristics explain frog diversity and abundance in Singapore. Biotropica 42: 119–125. -
5. Blakey, R. V., E.B. Webb, D.C. Kesler, R.B. Siegel, D. Corcoran & M. Johnson. 2019. Bats in a changing landscape: Linking occupancy and traits of a diverse montane bat community to fire regime. Ecol. Evol. ece3.5121. -
6. Canedoli, C., R. Manenti & E. Padoa-Schioppa. 2018. Birds biodiversity in urban and periurban forests: environmental determinants at local and landscape scales. Urban Ecosyst. 21: 779–793. -
7. Chace, J.F. & J.J. Walsh. 2006. Urban effects on native avifauna: A review. Landsc. Urban Plan. 74: 46–69. -
8. Clements, S.L., S.V.L. Catania & C.A. Searcy. 2019. Non-native species dominate herpetofaunal community patterns in both native and non-native habitat patches in urban Miami-Dade County. Biol. Invasions 21: 1775–1788. -
9. Derek Corcoran. 2017. Package “DiversityOccupancy” Type Package Title Building Diversity Models from Multiple Species Occupancy Models. -
10. Drinnan, I.N. 2005. The search for fragmentation thresholds in a Southern Sydney Suburb. Biol. Conserv. 124: 339–349. -
11. Dures, S.G. & G.S. Cumming. 2010. The confounding influence of homogenising invasive species in a globally endangered and largely urban biome: Does habitat quality dominate avian biodiversity? Biol. Conserv. 143: 768–777. -
12. Fahrig, L. 2003. Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 34: 487–515. -
13. Fahrig, L. 2013. Rethinking patch size and isolation effects: The habitat amount hypothesis. J. Biogeogr. 40: 1649–1663. -
14. Fahrig, L. 2019. Habitat fragmentation: A long and tangled tale. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 28: 33–41. -
15. Fahrig, L., V. Arroyo-Rodríguez, J.R. Bennett, V. Boucher-Lalonde, E. Cazetta, D.J. Currie, F. Eigenbrod, A.T. Ford, S.P. Harrison, J.A.G. Jaeger, N. Koper, A.E. Martin, J.L. Martin, J.P. Metzger, P. Morrison, J.R. Rhodes, D.A. Saunders, D. Simberloff, A.C. Smith, L. Tischendorf, M. Vellend & J.I. Watling. 2019. Is habitat fragmentation bad for biodiversity? Biol. Conserv. 230: 179–186. -
16. Ficetola, G.F., R. Sacchi, S. Scali, A. Gentilli, F. De Bernardi & P. Galeotti. 2007. Vertebrates respond differently to human disturbance: implications for the use of a focal species approach. Acta Oecologica 31: 109–118. -
17. Filloy, J., G.A. Zurita & M.I. Bellocq. 2019. Bird Diversity in Urban Ecosystems: The Role of the Biome and Land Use Along Urbanization Gradients. Ecosystems 22: 213–227. -
18. French, S.S., A.C. Webb, S.B. Hudson & E.E. Virgin. 2018. Town and Country Reptiles: A Review of Reptilian Responses to Urbanization. Integr. Comp. Biol. 58: 948–966. -
19. Gagné, S.A. & L. Fahrig. 2007. Effect of landscape context on anuran communities in breeding ponds in the National Capital Region, Canada. Landsc. Ecol. 22: 205–215. -
20. Garden, J.G., C.A. McAlpine & H.P. Possingham. 2010. Multi-scaled habitat considerations for conserving urban biodiversity: Native reptiles and small mammals in Brisbane, Australia. Landsc. Ecol. 25: 1013–1028. -
21. Goertzen, D. & F. & Suhling. 2012. Promoting dragonfly diversity in cities: major determinants and implications for urban pond design. J. Insect Conserv. 399–409. -
22. Guillera-Arroita, G., M. Kéry & J.J. Lahoz-Monfort. 2019. Inferring species richness using multispecies occupancy modeling: Estimation performance and interpretation. Ecol. Evol. 9: 780–792. -
23. Harper, K.A., S.E. Macdonald, P.J. Burton, J. Chen, K.D. Brosofske, S.C. Saunders, E.S. Euskirchen, D. Roberts, M.S. Jaiteh & P.A. Esseen. 2005. Edge influence on forest structure and composition in fragmented landscapes. Conserv. Biol. 19: 768–782. -
24. He, F. & P. Legendre. 2002. Species Diversity Patterns Derived from Species-Area Models. Ecology 83: 1185. -
25. Helmus, M.R. & A.R. Ives. 2012. Phylogenetic diversity–area curves. Ecology 93: S31–S43. -
26. Hijmans, R.J., J. Van Etten, M. Sumner, J. Cheng, A. Bevan, R. Bivand, L. Busetto, M. Canty, D. Forrest, D. Golicher, J. Gray, J.A. Greenberg, P. Hiemstra, C. Karney, S. Mosher, A. Shortridge, B. Venables, R. Wueest & M.R.J. Hijmans. 2019. Package ‘ raster ’ R topics documented 1–249. -
27. Hilty, S.L. & B. Brown. 1986. A guide to the birds of Colombia. Princeton University Press. -
28. Kéry, M. & J.A. Royle. 2016. Applied heirarchical modeling in ecology. Analysis of distribution, abundance m and species richness in R and BUGS. -
29. Kusch, J., C. Weber, S. Idelberger & T. Koob. 2004. Foraging habitat preferences of bats in relation to food supply and spatial vegetation structures in a western European low mountain range forest. Folia Zool. 53: 113–128. -
30. Lee, M.-B., I. Peabotuwage, H. Gu, W. Zhou & E. Goodale. 2019. Factors affecting avian species richness and occupancy in a tropical city in southern China: Importance of human disturbance and open green space. Basic Appl. Ecol. 39: 48–56. -
31. Luniak, M. 2008. Fauna of the big city-Estimating species richness and abundance in Warsaw Poland. Urban Ecol. An Int. Perspect. Interact. Between Humans Nat. 349–354. -
32. Melles, S., S. Glenn & K. Martin. 2003. Urban Bird Diversity and Landscape Complexity: Species– environment Associations Along a Multiscale Habitat Gradient 7. -
33. Moretto, L. & C.M. Francis. 2017. What factors limit bat abundance and diversity in temperate, North American urban environments? J. Urban Ecol. 3: 1–9. -
34. Neckel-Oliveira, S. & C. Gascon. 2006. Abundance, body size and movement patterns of a tropical reefrog in continuous and fragmented forests in the Brazilian Amazon. Biol. Conserv. 128: 308–315. -
35. Oprea, M., Æ.P. Mendes, Æ.T.B. Vieira & Æ.A.D. Ditchfield. 2009. Do wooded streets provide connectivity for bats in an urban landscape? Biodivers. Conserv. 2361–2371. -
36. Parris, K.M. 2006. Urban amphibian assemblages as metacommunities. J. Anim. Ecol. 75: 757–764. -
37. Phillips, B.L., G.P. Brown, M. Greenlees, J.K. Webb & R. Shine. 2007. Rapid expansion of the cane toad (Bufo marinus) invasion front in tropical Australia 169–176. -
38. Qian, H., X. Wang, S. Wang & Y. Li. 2007. Environmental determinants of amphibian and reptile species richness in China. Ecography (Cop.). 30: 471–482. -
39. Ramírez-Chaves, H.E., O. Mejía-Egas & G. Zambrano-G. 2008. Anotaciones sobre dieta, estado reproductivo, actividad y tamaño de colonia del murciélago mastín común (Molossus molossus: Molossidae) en la zona urbana de Popayán, Departamento del Cauca, Colombia. Chiropt. Neotrop. 14: 384–390. -
40. Riitters, K.H., J.W. Coulston & J.D. Wickham. 2012. Fragmentation of forest communities in the eastern United States. For. Ecol. Manage. 263: 85–93. -
41. Rödder, D., M. Solé & W. Böhme. 2008. Predicting the potential distributions of two alien invasive Housegeckos (Gekkonidae: Hemidactylus frenatus, Hemidactylus mabouia) 4: 236–246. -
42. Rodrigues, A.G., M. Borges-Martins & F. Zilio. 2018. Bird diversity in an urban ecosystem: The role of local habitats in understanding the effects of urbanization. Iheringia - Ser. Zool. 108. -
43. Sattler, T., D. Borcard, R. Arlettaz, F. Bontadina, P. Legendre, M.K. Obrist & M. Moretti. 2010. Spider, bee, and bird communities in cities are shaped by environmental control and high stochasticity. Ecology 91: 3343–3353. -
44. Schlaepfer, M.A. & T.A. Gavin. 2001. Edge effects on lizards and frogs in tropical forest fragments. Conserv. Biol. 15: 1079–1089. -
45. Sievers, M., R. Hale, S.E. Swearer & K.M. Parris. 2018. Frog occupancy of polluted wetlands in urban landscapes. Conserv. Biol. 1–36. -
46. Soares, C. & J.C. Brito. 2007. Environmental correlates for species richness among amphibians and reptiles in a climate transition area. Biodivers. Conserv. 16: 1087–1102. -
47. Suarez-Rubio, M., C. Ille & A. Bruckner. 2018. Insectivorous bats respond to vegetation complexity in urban green spaces. Ecol. Evol. 8: 3240–3253. -
48. Threlfall, C.G., L. Mata, J.A. Mackie, A.K. Hahs, N.E. Stork, N.S.G. Williams & S.J. Livesley. 2017. Increasing biodiversity in urban green spaces through simple vegetation interventions. J. Appl. Ecol. 54: 1874–1883. -
49. Tiwary, N.K. & A.J. Urfi. 2016. Spatial variations of bird occupancy in Delhi: The significance of woodland habitat patches in urban centres. Urban For. Urban Green. 20: 338–347. -
50. Vignoli, L., I. Mocaer, L. Luiselli & M.A. Bologna. 2009. Can a large metropolis sustain complex herpetofauna communities ? An analysis of the suitability of green space fragments in Rome 12: 456–466. -
51. Voigt, C.C. & T. Kingston. 2015. Bats in the anthropocene: Conservation of bats in a changing world, Bats in the Anthropocene: Conservation of Bats in a Changing World. -
52. Wang, X., N.G. Swenson, T. Wiegand, A. Wolf, R. Howe, F. Lin, J. Ye, Z. Yuan, S. Shi, X. Bai, D. Xing & Z. Hao. 2013. Phylogenetic and functional diversity area relationships in two temperate forests. Ecography (Cop.). 36: 883–893. -
53. Watling, J.I., V. Arroyo‐Rodríguez, M. Pfeifer, L. Baeten, C. Banks‐Leite, L.M. Cisneros, Re. Fang, A.C. Hamel‐Leigue, T. Lachat, I.R. Leal, L. Lens, H.P. Possingham, D.C. Raheem, D.B. Ribeiro, E.M. Slade, J.N. Urbina‐Cardona, E.M. Wood & L. Fahrig. 2020. Support for the habitat amount hypothesis from a global synthesis of species density studies. Ecol. Lett. ele.13471. -
54. White, J.H., J.M. Smith, S.D. Bassett, J.L. Brown & Z.E. Ormsby. 2018. Raptor nesting locations along an urban density gradient in the Great Basin, USA. Urban Ecosyst. 21: 51–60. -
55. Wolff, P.J., B.A. Degregorio, V. Rodriguez-Cruz, E. Mulero-Oliveras & J.H. Sperry. 2018. Bird community assemblage and distribution in a tropical, urban ecosystem of Puerto Rico. Trop. Conserv. Sci. 11. -
56. Xu, H. 2006. Modification of normalised difference water index (NDWI) to enhance open water features in remotely sensed imagery. Int. J. Remote Sens. 27: 3025–3033. -
57. Zuur, A.F., E.N. Ieno & C.S. Elphick. 2010. A protocol for data exploration to avoid common statistical problems. -